THE DIMENSIONS AND DYNAMICS OF CONNECTIVE
TECHNOLOGY
Introduction
The purpose for this white paper is to provide
a basis and reason for the “transportation and logistics applications
technology revolution”, and to demonstrate that “connective
technology” is the key facilitator for: future development; growth;
and sustainability; as well as presenting thoughts and ideas of
relevant, forward thinking applications.
Executive Summary
“Connective Technology”, if defined
as, “a means and a method for transporting data and information
within, amongst and between trading partners”, than it is the
basis upon which collaborative applications rest. If you
agree with this notion, than connective technology is also
the underpinning of the “era of enormous transportation and
logistics applications potential”.
Background
A revolution occurred in 1995 when transportation
in the United States experienced its second most influential event!
Deregulation had been occurring over many years, perhaps as far
back as the mid to late 1940’s. Possibly, President Truman
only spoke of it casually, but by 1972 with the expansion of the
“commercial zones”, followed by the elimination of the Civil Aeronautics
Board, the undercharge scam of the 80’s, along with the elimination
of the need to prove, “public convenience and necessity” as a
condition precedent to becoming a common carrier; these critical
events were in place to support a revolution. In 1995 when
the Interstate Commerce Commission and the companion state departments
of transportation were terminated, a date was fixed to the transportation
revolution.
January 1, 1995 ushered in a new “era of enormous
transportation and logistics potential and opportunity!
Unfortunately tradition dies hard, and the opportunity to continue
squeezing the last penny from adversarial freight cost negotiations
not only continued beyond deregulation, it became more prevalent.
The adversarial relationship between shipper, carrier, and consignee
that existed during financial regulation was, for a time re-energized
by deregulation.
Click here to read the entire paper
Rates, rebates, and other forms of predatory
and non-compensatory practices increased; carriers were no longer
exempt from the Sherman Anti Trust Act and tariffs proliferated
almost equal to the dramatic increase in the number of enterprises
becoming carriers. The rapid increase in the numbers of
carriers together with the swell of defunct carriers furthered
the separation.
Shippers, carriers, and consignees were early
adapters of micrologistics
[1]
applications, but their independent use also
increased the distance between them.
Essentially, deregulation manifested itself
in a knee jerk reflex, portrayed by the carriers offering depressed
freight rates to ward off a waterfall of new competition and spoilers.
Likewise, shippers and consignees supported this attitude by pitting
one carrier against another in an effort to drive down freight
rates even further.
While the advantages or disadvantages of regulation
vs. deregulation could be long argued, most would agree that deregulation
as well as the other events described above, cried out for,
at least, freight rate and tariff automation. History is
still being written, but today it could be effectively argued
that tariff automation coupled with the foregoing events was one
of the trumpets heralding in a new era of transportation and logistics
software applications that recognized the importance of connective
technology.
A Time and an Environment,
Ripe for Change
The late 1980’s witnessed the height of shipper,
carrier, and consignee acrimony, widening the gap and separating
them even further apart. Notwithstanding this entrenched
attitude, it was clear, retrospectively that this period bore
witness to changing minds. Recognizing that greater opportunities
awaited shippers, carriers and consignees beyond freight rate
reductions, adversarial price driven negotiations were becoming
a thing of the past.
By 1995 the industrial mindset towards freight
transportation was changing from the adversarial, price driven
posture to a mature understanding that shippers, carriers, and
consignees could become “trading partners”. Like all other
trading partners, they could finally avail themselves of the same
opportunities accorded other commercial and industrial relationships.
Enabled by connective technology, “events of
transportation importance” and other technological advances, influenced
by timing and converging on what will become known as, “the new
era of enormous transportation and logistics potential”; the golden
age of transportation and logistics management and information
software applications was born.
The adversarial transportation relationships
that began prior to 1887, finally gave way to a new atmosphere
founded upon a cooperative environment, whose foremost principle
was the recognition of the advantages of a symbiotic relationship
among shippers, carriers, and consignees.
Fundamental Elements of Change
The bonds that secure and foster all relationships
are the ability to articulate and to effectively communicate.
In order to communicate, the parties must be able to “connect”.
“Connective” is defined as, the act
of joining. For the purpose of this white paper, “connective”
means the act of joining trading partners. To further describe
the relevant meaning of “connective”, consideration should
be given to the word, “Connectivity”. It is defined as,
“the ability of hardware devices, software packages, or a computer
itself to work with network devices or work with other hardware
devices, software packages, or a computer over a network connection.
[2]
“Technology” is the application of science
and engineering for the development of efficiency and effectiveness.
As in all relationships, there are very specific
events that pave the way to the future, in the case of “connective
technology” the TDCC was the event, and EDI was the device
that facilitated the connection amongst, within, and between the
trading partners. EDI and transportation, as measured by
today’s standards, has a long history dating back to the early
1960’s, when some very clever transportation and MIS professionals
joined forces in Washington, DC and formed the Transportation
Data Coordinating Committee (TDCC). The TDCC established
the first set of communication standards which enabled EDI.
Another very important component necessary
for a solid “connective technology culture”, one that
would be capable of developing and growing highly coherent and
intelligent micrologistics applications; processes; information;
and management systems was “convergence”. Convergence
is the “coming together of like and disparate knowledge bases,
skill sets, technologies and disciplines; the purpose of which
is to solve business equations with the intended benefits of creating
new paradigms and achievements that would be unachievable through
traditional methods”.
[3]
The Internet became the primary domain and
common repository for data and information. With reasonably
secure Internet connections, driven by the need to exchange data
and information, coupled with the potential benefits that shared
information could provide, the logistics trading partners began
to more freely invest in collaborative micrologistics applications.
Fueled by the benefits’ incentive, appreciation
for “connective technology empowered micrologistics applications”
grew rapidly, and across the industrial spectrum. In addition
to the traditional types of systems/services such as: service
bureaus, licensed programs and those that were internally developed;
the ASP (application service provider) along with the BPO (business
process outsourcing) were introduced. The Internet became
a “ubiquitous and democratized platform for collaborative technology
driven transportation and micrologistics applications”.
With the introduction of “mass”, relevant “connective” software
applications gathered momentum.
Who are the Trading Partners?
The “logistics trading partners” have multiple
identities that are based upon time and event. As an example,
when they are neither shipping, receiving nor carrying goods,
their identity changes to manufacturer, distributor, retailer,
buyer, seller or any of a host of relevant industrial and commercial
descriptions. Their alternating industrial life forms determine
their respective operating requirements and styles, as well as
defining the data and information they each produce. Correspondingly,
their alternating industrial life forms determine their data and
information needs, simultaneously influencing when they are needed.
The Freight Paradigm
Yesterday’s view of “freight transportation”
limited its understanding, function, and purpose to picking up
or delivering products.
Yesterday’s freight paradigm was limited
to the belief that, "it was only a product whose initial identity
began when it was placed in a shipping container, of any kind;
and lost that identity when it left the container”.
Today's freight
paradigm
[4] views the “entire
life cycle of freight” beginning with its first appearance
in the supply chain as an SKU, and continuing on its lifelong
journey through the entire supply chain, concluding with its ultimate
consumption.
Today’s paradigm recognizes that “freight”
has three (3) primary touch points within the supply chain: pre-shipment;
in-transit and post-shipment. In addition to these, there
are an infinite number of secondary and tertiary physical and
virtual stops throughout the supply chain, which also represent
important data opportunities.
Each industrial life form has a relative view
of “freight”, but still embrace the general definition of “freight”,
“Goods carried by a vessel or vehicle, especially by a commercial
carrier, cargo”
[5]
Today’s freight paradigm recognizes the existence
of a “freight alter ego”. The “alter ego” travels with the
physical freight and acts as a “penetrator” and collector.
It operates pervasively amongst the trading partners’ respective
supply chains, moving through and across their departments while
bridging corporate disciplines, and continuously collecting and
appending the data and information. Collecting data from
the supply chain transaction stream provides the trading partners
with a constantly refreshed, robust database that is highly capable
of being effectively managed and exploited.
Logistics, the Beginning of the New Potential
[6]
In addition to the standard, non-military dictionary
definition of logistics, “managing the flow of raw material through
the finishing process”, logistics “manages, integrates, and controls
the flow of information, material, and money”
[7] . Essentially, logistics is capable of
managing multiple, complex inter and intra-departmental relationships
and disciplines simultaneously. “The Dichotomy of Logistics”
[8] speaks to the two primary components of logistics:
“Macrologistics is the study and management
of the overall aspects, process, and workings of logistics”.
“Micrologistics is the study of the
operations and the application of the components of logistics,
such as transportation, inventory, warehousing, purchasing, and
customer service.”
By understanding the two primary components,
it becomes clear that they are well capable of managing and operating,
multiple and varying complex activities simultaneously.
Micrologistics components give the “freight alter ego” its pervasive
license to transport itself across and through every department
and business discipline, both internal and external.
Convergence: An Applications’ Cross Cultivated
Intelligence
Connective technology enables the trading
partners to better exploit their respective corporate knowledge
bases. Intra and inter-departmental relationships and disciplines
that are empowered by convergence work groups, rely on connective
technology to maximize capability and to fulfill its promise.
A convergence
work group that includes transportation and logistics professionals
is enriched by their unique perspectives
[9] and intelligence.
Additionally, the convergence work group’s ability to exploit
the corporate knowledgebase offers limitless opportunities for
creating new applications, benefits, and paradigms
[10]
Today’s logistics and transportation professionals
have earned their seats at the corporate tables and are now in
a position to offer worldwide commerce and industry the benefit
of their unique perspective, organizational centric
[11] position, knowledge and wisdom. Their
organizational or corporate centric position and awareness of
and sensitivity to the corporate knowledgebase, position these
professionals adjacent to one of the largest “data pools of potential
opportunity”
[12]
This robust pool contains universally appealing
and important data that has been gathered from the supply chain
transaction stream; data such as: purchasing; sales; warehouse;
credit and collections; Bills of Lading; internal and external
transportation; delivery; that are shaped by each industrial life
form.
Wireless technology significantly improves
the efficiency and effectiveness for transporting data that are
collected from the supply chain transaction stream
The convergence of wireless technology and
Freight Life Cycle Management(sm) joins two (2) highly
influential and dynamic business methods and functions that considerably
improves the speed, quality, quantity and type of data that can
be collected, processed and converted to information
Consistent
with today’s freight paradigm, there are an infinite number of
“physical stops” in addition to “virtual stops” at which data
can and should be collected. When wireless technology is
coupled with “Freight Life Cycle Management(sm)”
[13] (FLCM), the needs of industry can be properly
addressed far more effectively because of the inherent ability
to rapidly deliver a meaningful real-time flow of information.
The inherent capabilities of wireless communications and FLCM
make a significant contribution to improved corporate performance
through timely and accurate decisions.
Connective technology facilitated systems that
utilize the Internet for their “trading partner knowledge bases”;
that are driven by expert systems delivered through an ASP are
positioned well for achieving logistics excellence. It is
connective technology that empowers the trading partners, positioning
them “to solve business equations with the intended benefits
of creating new paradigms and applications”.
The Dichotomy of Forward
Looking Applications
In order to move forward and to sustain
growth and development, there must be a solid platform comprised
of an understandable history, which has evolved logically.
Logical evolutions are highly capable of supporting rapid growth
and development.
Clearly, transportation and logistics information
and management applications, facilitated by connective technology
have proliferated over the last several years and will continue
to populate the corporate landscape. For the most part,
these connective applications fall into, at least, two broad categories:
repackaged single user systems that have been wrapped in communications
software, that allow networking; and the true network applications
that have evolved from a solid history and logical evolution enabled
by connective technology.
Within this latter group, it is highly
probable that two applications paths will emerge: a continuation
of commercial business applications; and politically driven security
applications motivated by international security concerns. To
meet tomorrow’s needs and to effectively deal with terrorism;
both groups must employ wireless connectivity.
Forward Looking Applications Enabled by Connective
Technology
Today’s freight paradigm satisfies the mandate
for initiating data collection at the earliest possible time.
This continuously refreshed data is universally important for
the trading partners’ individual and combined success. Independently
and collectively, it supports timely and accurate decisions.
Two forward thinking applications are being
presented. The first is a commercial application that incorporates
the “freight life cycle” concept; and the second is a security
application that addresses the need for effective homeland security.
While they are separate applications, their design embraces incremental
and connectible concepts and features. RFID and RF are used
to collect data and convey information.
These two forward thinking applications’ design
and structure embrace forward thinking concepts and techniques
that allow them to rapidly employ new technology. The ability
to employ new technology is a key factor that should allow this
security solution to stay ahead of the challenge.
Forward Looking--Commercial
Logistics Application
Tracking freight in the new freight paradigm
– In the new freight paradigm, the movement of
goods; whether they are between vendor and customer; warehouse
shelf and staging; or inventory and production, is defined as
transportation. In this regard, a “carrier” can be viewed
as: a commercial carrier; a forklift; an employee; or a pick cart.
A “container” can be viewed as: a shipping carton; a pallet; an
envelope or a warehouse bin. The transition from the old
to the new paradigm and the necessitated change in thinking has
bridged the old barriers between transportation and warehousing
where, in transportation, time in transit was measured in days
(or perhaps hours) while in warehousing, time in transit was measured
in minutes (or perhaps seconds). Therefore, viewing freight
in the new freight paradigm requires that the movement of all
goods be measured at there smallest increments to facilitate the
workflow and needs of all active and passive participants.
In order to effectively track and manage “freight”
at such a small interval requires a device that can tie people,
goods, time, and location together. By incorporating wireless
technology, data applications have crossed this hurdle and provided
data, metrics, responsibility and accountability to accommodate
the functions and needs of all users.
A Tracking, Receiving, and Internal Delivery
System
[14] benefits from those new associated and attendant
opportunities for accountability and responsibility as a result
of time and material. Important tasks such as the following
are capable of being performed:
Buy-in and Sell Through Analysis
Managing inventory more efficiently
Improving put-away, usage and throughput
Develop a meaningful formula for inventory
levels
Reduce service level costs
Improving the percentage of meeting customer
expectations
Achieving deliverables
Establishing meaningful service levels
Ongoing competitive assessment, both internal
and external
Analysis and reporting from a robust database
A Forward Looking--Security
Application
Background
Motor freight transportation is pervasive!
In essence, it licenses trucks to travel on every highway; pass
and enter every conceivable: business structure; government installation;
public utility; dam and reservoir; and cross over every bridge
and through every tunnel. Motor freight transportation is
responsible for delivering our food and merchandise; and material
for building homes and factories; and at the end of the process
they remove our refuse. With their freedom to roam and their
ability to transport goods, trucking is responsible for a very
large part of the economy.
Trucks can also carry munitions and weapons
of mass destruction including, but not limited to biological hazards
and nuclear material. They can carry inert material such
as nuts and bolts; the weight of which can be an effective ramming
device plowing into and destroying a bridge support. Trucks
can carry freight that is harmless, but when combined can become
a highly effective explosive. A truck can deliver any material
to an assembly or material marshalling point; the subsequent use
of which could be for terrorism.
Motor freight transportation is the life blood
of the nation’s economy. Transportation is the supply chain
vehicle, and without it there is no supply chain or economy!
A truck can wander throughout the nation at
will and it is this very ability that demands our attention in
post 9/11. Homeland security is at risk because of the viability
of our freight transportation system and more specifically the
truck.
The Department of Transportation, in the early
part of October, 2001 was highly motivated because of that realization,
and solicited white papers of “ongoing technical or project activity
that addressed homeland security”. Because of the nature
of this solution, certain information has been intentionally excluded.
DOT/FAA Scope of Interest:
“To improve the security, or reduce the vulnerability
of transportation service to accidental or intentional disruption.
It involves the physical infrastructure and vehicles associated
with pipelines, rail, ports and waterways, civil aviation, mass
transit, highways, and especially combinations of these modes
and the interfaces between and among them as well as the information
infrastructure associated with their operation and control.
Their aim is to take necessary steps to identify promising technologies
and concepts and to promote their expeditious implementation.”
1.
The human
factor, such as the driver, the dispatcher/planner, etc
2.
The vehicle--transporting
and/or containing the freight, such as the tractor/trailer.
3.
The material
that is being transported – i.e. the freight
4.
The infrastructure
– the roads, bridges, tunnels, public utilities, nuclear facilities,
etc.
5.
The alerting
and dispatch of properly equipped response teams.
The first check is the credibility of the driver
followed by the integrity of the equipment. The license is scanned
into the vehicle’s black box. This box contains the data
of the rig, tractor unit, van, tow-truck, barge, engine, etc.
The combined driver and equipment data is transmitted to a regional
control center for automatic real-time verification, validation,
and storage. The regional control center database will be
linked to other government departments, such as the INS, FBI,
CIA, and all other appropriate federal, state and local government
agencies.
The second check is against the load documentation
that describes the freight. This data is typically
an extension of the RF/bar code processes currently used to track
freight to the vehicle, and is a continuation of the database
used by Warehouse Management Systems (WMS) and truck routing systems
to plan and manage freight and rig movements.
The third check relates to the trailer and
freight information using the data held on file by the licensing
authority which interacts with the driver transmitted data.
The fourth check addresses location; and utilizes
GPS and route tracking software. This check has two distinct
functions. First, it ensures that the tractor/trailer/freight/driver
combinations do not enter the public domain until all verifications
have been achieved; secondly, it monitors the location of vehicles
relevant to vulnerable locations and situations.
The fifth check employs interactive vehicle
routing software coupled with GPS to satisfy surveillance.
The system maintains various “thresholds” that
work in conjunction with severity levels. Corresponding
dispatch of an appropriate response are rationalized by the system.
The combined activities and processes are interactive
and allow analysis to take place 24/7 using random system penetration
points. This process allows the system to perform risk assessment
at will and simultaneously compares its results to operator initiated
risk assessment. One of the advantages of this routine is that
it eliminates false/positives that could be operator or unauthorized
user induced.
Conclusion
Logistics is a highly robust business discipline
capable of providing industry with important tools including an
“energized corporate knowledgebase”. Function and performance
place logistics in a pivotal role because it is responsible for
raw material moving into, through and finished product out.
The inter-intradepartmental and inter-intradisciplinary relationships
that are affected by, and because of logistics, makes it organizational
centric. Its inherent capabilities enabled by connective
technology offer industry a platform from which the intellectual
promise of cross cultivated intelligence can be realized in corporate
performance.
[2]
Microsoft Press® Computer
and Internet Dictionary © &
℗ 1997, 1998 Microsoft Corporation. All rights
reserved. Portions, The Microsoft Press® Computer Dictionary,
3rd Edition, Copyright © 1998 by Microsoft Press. All
rights reserved.
[5] Excerpted from The American Heritage Dictionary
of the English Language, Third Edition Copyright © 1992
by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from
Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V., further reproduction
and distribution restricted in accordance with the Copyright
Law of the United States. All rights reserved.
Continuation
Please consider this white paper
as a continuum in this subject area, succeeding white papers will
address common issues and address them with common solutions.
We encourage our readers to direct any specific questions or comments
to
papers@transportgistics.com
.
Disclaimer
The
information presented above represents the opinion of the author
and not necessarily the opinion of TransportGistics, Inc. nor
is it presented as a legal position.
All
content copyright by TransportGistics, Inc. All rights are reserved.
The authors of the articles retain the copyright to their articles.
No material may be reproduced electronically or in print without
the express written permission from TransportGistics, Inc. or
the individual authors (papers@TransportGistics.com)